Recruitment of participants GoldS Fly v3.0

[Kamikaze]

I'm not getting the same results as everyone else. Did I make a mistake in my settings?

 

[sykfx]

Bro, seriously ? what you known about this bot ? Nothing... just annoing..
Test it and put them in real, after that you can talk about it.

you are right! Though have you checked the entry and time duration? Some are less than 1 second and majority is few seconds and take profit is very little. So I take it it's more of break out on 1 minute chart. Which why I said like Turbo ai.

 

[sykfx]

I'm not getting the same results as everyone else. Did I make a mistake in my settings?

Risk % should be 1 not 0.1

 

[Kamikaze]

Did you backtest using all ticks, or using real ticks? The results were excellent with all ticks, but the results with real ticks are attached.

 

[Kamikaze]

Risk % should be 1 not 0.1

Since the test was conducted with a fixed rod, I don't think that item is relevant.

 

[sykfx]

I'm not getting the same results as everyone else. Did I make a mistake in my settings?

I can't even test it because parameter doesn't even show up on mine. I am just stating from the observation of the thread

 

[sykfx]

Like I said its probably like 1 min breakout strategy

 

[alekseisvv]

I backtested on Roboforex, FPMarkets, Exness, VTMarkets,´everywhere ECN or RAW, settings by default and changed like here https://clubbingbuy.exchange/attachments/1778358434405-webp.17036/
And everywhere results are like shit.
Unfortunatly, I don't have ICMarkets, but I don't beleave results from this broker is different.
But I found you know what? IF you test on on just "every tick" THEN you get that perfect picture
I see some stupid one even does not know what different is if you test on just "every tick" or "every tick based on real ticks"

 

[lolipopy]

I backtested on Roboforex, FPMarkets, Exness, VTMarkets,´everywhere ECN or RAW, settings by default and changed like here https://clubbingbuy.exchange/attachments/1778358434405-webp.17036/
And everywhere results are like shit.
Unfortunatly, I don't have ICMarkets, but I don't beleave results from this broker is different.
But I found you know what? IF you test on on just "every tick" THEN you get that perfect picture
I see some stupid one even does not know what different is if you test on just "every tick" or "every tick based on real ticks"

just for you... 2026.. o that "every tick based on real ticks" history does have only 73% quality.. point that

 

[alekseisvv]

just for you... 2026.. o that "every tick based on real ticks" history does have only 73% quality.. point that
View attachment 17063
View attachment 17064

WHAT? WHAT? WHAT??? What 73%??? What shitty broker do you use?

 

[lolipopy]

We all wait for markets open to test it in real markets

 

[lolipopy]

WHAT? WHAT? WHAT??? What 73%??? What shitty broker do you use?

make the test with these parameters i sayed before..


Started with: $100 RAW ECN account
Risk: 1% for each trade
Protect DD: 1%, Stop and back next day if it reached.

 

[lolipopy]

make the test with these parameters i sayed before..


Started with: $100 RAW ECN account
Risk: 1% for each trade
Protect DD: 1%, Stop and back next day if it reached.

 

[lolipopy]

I dont have same results as your..

 

[BigL88]

Slippage will kill this I imagine on live. Might work a dream on demo.

 

[dshel]

Forward testing is the gold standard. Let’s try it ASAP. I would only use during London and first few hours NY.. not around any calendar ‘‘Red’ news and only when spreads extremely tight… VPS with latency 1-2ms (dedicated server). All this back testing is just a crude guide if not considering this. Use Dukascopy or similar. Broker data usually limited.

 

[lolipopy]

Forward testing is the gold standard. Let’s try it ASAP. I would only use during London and first few hours NY.. not around any calendar ‘‘Red’ news and only when spreads extremely tight… VPS with latency 1-2ms (dedicated server). All this back testing is just a crude guide if not considering this. Use Dukascopy or similar. Broker data usually limited.

 

[FewestCookies]

I have been using these settings and backtest makes about 1-2% than real account with Vantage ECN because it locks spread at 12 but sometimes Vantage will go to 12-15 on raw accounts. The martingale is not needed.

 

[lolipopy]

I have been using these settings and backtest makes about 1-2% than real account with Vantage ECN because it locks spread at 12 but sometimes Vantage will go to 12-15 on raw accounts. The martingale is not needed.
View attachment 17070

ok, so it's profitable in real, right ?

 

[FewestCookies]

it is profitable but its like Goldwave if you dont have a ton of equity it will take small quick wins. The back test is obviously optimized if you run it on an older year for example 2023 then it shows a more realistic expectation.