Recruitment of participants V2.1 Waris Singo barong MT5

[GOODMEN]

V2.1 Waris Singo barong MT5​

Description​

Pairs: BTCUSD or XAUUSD
Timeframe: 1M
Minimum deposit: $200 20k cent

Live Results:

Yangi V2.1 versiyasi o’rnatildi
MT5 logini: 34113492
Parol: V2.1Barong@Free
Server: VantageMarkets-Live 11

Eski V2.1 versiyasi o’rnatildi
Mt5 logini: 31575341
Parol: V2Barong@Free
Vantage – market Live 11

reseller

 

[yes31]

It look good

 

[cuibaper]

Cannot access this account:
Yangi V2.1 versiyasi o’rnatildi
MT5 logini: 34113492
Parol: V2.1Barong@Free
Server: VantageMarkets-Live 11

 

[ronea]

Cannot access this account:
Yangi V2.1 versiyasi o’rnatildi
MT5 logini: 34113492
Parol: V2.1Barong@Free
Server: VantageMarkets-Live 11

yeah , only use this account
Eski V2.1 versiyasi o’rnatildi
Mt5 logini: 31575341
Parol: V2Barong@Free
Vantage – market Live 11

 

[ronea]

It look good

yeah its good ea lets go !

 

[cuibaper]

I just had AI analyze the results, and I have to say, they’re really bad. At one point, the drawdown reached 100% of the capital, and when looking specifically at the trades related to Waris Singo Barong, they were basically breakeven overall, with no real profit.

 

[ronea]

I just had AI analyze the results, and I have to say, they’re really bad. At one point, the drawdown reached 100% of the capital, and when looking specifically at the trades related to Waris Singo Barong, they were basically breakeven overall, with no real profit.

In my opinion, your current AI system needs to be reconfigured; it cannot detect future market movements, so you cannot use it for analysis. We can adjust the drawdown parameters on the EA to achieve optimal results.

 

[cuibaper]

In my opinion, your current AI system needs to be reconfigured; it cannot detect future market movements, so you cannot use it for analysis. We can adjust the drawdown parameters on the EA to achieve optimal results.

Please read the report:

Singo Barong EA — Risk & Trade Analysis​

Source: MT5 Trade History Report — Account 31575341 (USC, VantageMarkets-Live 11, Real, Hedge).

Executive Summary​

The headline profit is misleading. The report shows 33,637.92 USC net profit, but also 34,594.95 USC maximal drawdown and 100.82% relative drawdown. Profit Factor is only 1.18 and Recovery Factor is 0.97. Therefore, the account generated positive profit, but the risk required to generate it was extremely high.

Net Profit	33,637.92 USC	Positive headline result
Profit Factor	1.18	Thin trading edge
Maximal Drawdown	34,594.95 USC	Very large
Relative Drawdown	100.82%	Extreme; see clarification below
Absolute Drawdown	3,283.04 USC	Separate MT5 DD measure
Total Trades	36,017	Large sample
Win Rate	48.75%	Below 50%
Average Win / Loss	12.66 / -10.22 USC	Only modest advantage
Recovery Factor	0.97	Weak recovery efficiency
Maximum Loss Streak	13 trades / -16,699 USC	Material tail risk

[th]

Metric​

[/th]​

[th]

Result​

[/th]​

[th]

Assessment​

[/th]​

Why a Near-100% Return Can Still Be Bad​

A 100% return is not automatically a good result. It must be compared with the drawdown and exposure required to obtain it.
A strategy earning 100% with a 10% drawdown is fundamentally different from one earning 100% while suffering an extreme drawdown.
Here, the reported Recovery Factor of 0.97 is particularly important: net profit is approximately the same magnitude as maximal drawdown. This means the system did not demonstrate strong recovery efficiency relative to the risk it took.
Important clarification about 100.82%: this is MT5's reported relative drawdown figure. It should not be interpreted literally as proof that the broker balance became exactly -0.82%. The underlying reported maximal drawdown is 34,594.95 USC. The safe conclusion is that the historical balance/equity path contained an exceptionally severe drawdown episode.

Waris Singo Barong EA — Exact Comment Analysis​

The report contains multiple comments beginning with Waris Singo Barong. To avoid mixing different modules, the exact comment Waris Singo Barong EA is analyzed separately.

Trades	1,599
Winning Trades	763 (47.72%)
Losing Trades	834
Gross Profit	3,587.30 USC
Gross Loss	-3,461.33 USC
Net Profit	125.97 USC
Profit Factor	1.036
Total Volume	20.05 lots
Maximum Volume	0.10 lot

[th]

Exact comment: Waris Singo Barong EA​

[/th]​

[th]

Result​

[/th]​

Interpretation: the exact-comment subset is essentially breakeven. Across 1,599 trades, Waris Singo Barong EA generated only 125.97 USC net profit, with a Profit Factor of approximately 1.04. Therefore, the overall account profit should not be attributed to the exact “Waris Singo Barong EA” comment.

Broader Waris Singo Barong Family​

If all comments containing “Waris Singo Barong” are grouped together:

Trades	5,185
Win Rate	39.36%
Gross Profit	8,587.44 USC
Gross Loss	-9,918.22 USC
Net Profit	-1,330.78 USC
Profit Factor	0.866

[th]

Metric​

[/th]​

[th]

Result​

[/th]​

The broader Waris family is loss-making in this report. All comments containing “Waris Singo Barong” totaled -1,330.78 USC.

Evidence from the Trade History​

On 7 July 2026, the trade history shows repeated XAUUSD.sc BUY entries tagged “Waris Singo Barong EA”, followed closely by “Waris Singo Barong 2”. Later entries include comments 3, 4 and 5.
This demonstrates that multiple Waris-tagged execution streams/modules can appear in closely spaced sequences.
Important: the comments prove the execution pattern, but the trade report alone does not prove the exact internal algorithm. It is therefore not appropriate to claim from the report alone that the system is formally Martingale or Grid. That would require the EA logic, settings, or logs.

Risk Conclusions​

• Positive profit does not mean good risk-adjusted performance. The account's profit is small relative to its reported maximal drawdown.
• Profit Factor 1.18 is thin. A relatively small deterioration in spread, commission, slippage or market regime can materially weaken the edge.
• Recovery Factor 0.97 is weak. The strategy did not demonstrate strong recovery efficiency relative to its worst drawdown.
• Waris Singo Barong EA alone is nearly breakeven. The exact comment generated only 125.97 USC across 1,599 trades.
• The broader Waris family lost money. All comments containing the Waris Singo Barong name totaled -1,330.78 USC in the supplied report.
• The critical missing metric is module-level floating exposure. To fully explain the 100.82% drawdown episode, the EA settings/logs and a reconstructed equity curve would be needed.

Bottom Line​

This account should not be judged by its positive headline return alone. The report shows a positive net result, but the combination of very high reported drawdown, low Profit Factor, weak Recovery Factor, and poor performance of the Waris-tagged trades makes the risk/reward profile unattractive.
In particular, the exact “Waris Singo Barong EA” trades did not generate meaningful profit in this report: 1,599 trades produced only 125.97 USC net profit.

 

[yes31]

Please read the report:

Singo Barong EA — Risk & Trade Analysis​

Source: MT5 Trade History Report — Account 31575341 (USC, VantageMarkets-Live 11, Real, Hedge).

Executive Summary​

The headline profit is misleading. The report shows 33,637.92 USC net profit, but also 34,594.95 USC maximal drawdown and 100.82% relative drawdown. Profit Factor is only 1.18 and Recovery Factor is 0.97. Therefore, the account generated positive profit, but the risk required to generate it was extremely high.

Net Profit	33,637.92 USC	Positive headline result
Profit Factor	1.18	Thin trading edge
Maximal Drawdown	34,594.95 USC	Very large
Relative Drawdown	100.82%	Extreme; see clarification below
Absolute Drawdown	3,283.04 USC	Separate MT5 DD measure
Total Trades	36,017	Large sample
Win Rate	48.75%	Below 50%
Average Win / Loss	12.66 / -10.22 USC	Only modest advantage
Recovery Factor	0.97	Weak recovery efficiency
Maximum Loss Streak	13 trades / -16,699 USC	Material tail risk

[th]
Metric

[/th]​

[th]
Result

[/th]​

[th]
Assessment

[/th]​

Why a Near-100% Return Can Still Be Bad​

A 100% return is not automatically a good result. It must be compared with the drawdown and exposure required to obtain it.
A strategy earning 100% with a 10% drawdown is fundamentally different from one earning 100% while suffering an extreme drawdown.
Here, the reported Recovery Factor of 0.97 is particularly important: net profit is approximately the same magnitude as maximal drawdown. This means the system did not demonstrate strong recovery efficiency relative to the risk it took.
Important clarification about 100.82%: this is MT5's reported relative drawdown figure. It should not be interpreted literally as proof that the broker balance became exactly -0.82%. The underlying reported maximal drawdown is 34,594.95 USC. The safe conclusion is that the historical balance/equity path contained an exceptionally severe drawdown episode.

Waris Singo Barong EA — Exact Comment Analysis​

The report contains multiple comments beginning with Waris Singo Barong. To avoid mixing different modules, the exact comment Waris Singo Barong EA is analyzed separately.

Trades	1,599
Winning Trades	763 (47.72%)
Losing Trades	834
Gross Profit	3,587.30 USC
Gross Loss	-3,461.33 USC
Net Profit	125.97 USC
Profit Factor	1.036
Total Volume	20.05 lots
Maximum Volume	0.10 lot

[th]
Exact comment: Waris Singo Barong EA

[/th]​

[th]
Result

[/th]​

Interpretation: the exact-comment subset is essentially breakeven. Across 1,599 trades, Waris Singo Barong EA generated only 125.97 USC net profit, with a Profit Factor of approximately 1.04. Therefore, the overall account profit should not be attributed to the exact “Waris Singo Barong EA” comment.

Broader Waris Singo Barong Family​

If all comments containing “Waris Singo Barong” are grouped together:

Trades	5,185
Win Rate	39.36%
Gross Profit	8,587.44 USC
Gross Loss	-9,918.22 USC
Net Profit	-1,330.78 USC
Profit Factor	0.866

[th]
Metric

[/th]​

[th]
Result

[/th]​

The broader Waris family is loss-making in this report. All comments containing “Waris Singo Barong” totaled -1,330.78 USC.

Evidence from the Trade History​

On 7 July 2026, the trade history shows repeated XAUUSD.sc BUY entries tagged “Waris Singo Barong EA”, followed closely by “Waris Singo Barong 2”. Later entries include comments 3, 4 and 5.
This demonstrates that multiple Waris-tagged execution streams/modules can appear in closely spaced sequences.
Important: the comments prove the execution pattern, but the trade report alone does not prove the exact internal algorithm. It is therefore not appropriate to claim from the report alone that the system is formally Martingale or Grid. That would require the EA logic, settings, or logs.

Risk Conclusions​

• Positive profit does not mean good risk-adjusted performance. The account's profit is small relative to its reported maximal drawdown.
• Profit Factor 1.18 is thin. A relatively small deterioration in spread, commission, slippage or market regime can materially weaken the edge.
• Recovery Factor 0.97 is weak. The strategy did not demonstrate strong recovery efficiency relative to its worst drawdown.
• Waris Singo Barong EA alone is nearly breakeven. The exact comment generated only 125.97 USC across 1,599 trades.
• The broader Waris family lost money. All comments containing the Waris Singo Barong name totaled -1,330.78 USC in the supplied report.
• The critical missing metric is module-level floating exposure. To fully explain the 100.82% drawdown episode, the EA settings/logs and a reconstructed equity curve would be needed.

Bottom Line​

This account should not be judged by its positive headline return alone. The report shows a positive net result, but the combination of very high reported drawdown, low Profit Factor, weak Recovery Factor, and poor performance of the Waris-tagged trades makes the risk/reward profile unattractive.
In particular, the exact “Waris Singo Barong EA” trades did not generate meaningful profit in this report: 1,599 trades produced only 125.97 USC net profit.

Thank u sir